data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8db17/8db178d3cef91afb89b12aca7872c1b0a1943ec5" alt=""
Dr. Ernest T. Pascarella |
One of the most profound statements made about social integration made in this article was:
Ironically, first-generation students derived greater outcome benefits from extracurricular involvement and peer interaction than other students even though they were significantly less likely to be engaged in these activities during college. (278)
Though most first-generation students participating at work more than anything else they really are not exposed to social ties. However, when they are involved in extracurricular activities, they tend to benefit more. This idea stresses the importance of social integration but also sheds light to the fact that first-generation college students normally don't have the option to participate. This is because they are focused on making money, paying tuition, paying for miscellaneous fees, or making early payments on the loans they have taken out. These students are also denied access to network of people that share their in their backgrounds.
The article also emphasizes the impact social integration has on academics. "Noncourse-related interactions with peers had impacts on science reasoning, writing skills, and educational degree plans that were significantly more positive for first-generation," (273). Social integration affects academic success. If less students participate outside of the classroom, then the likelihood of them failing or dropping out increases. This is true among first-generation college students. They are less likely to participate outside of class because of their condition, and therefore they are less likely to complete college.
Works Cited
Pascarella,
Ernest T., Christopher T. Pierson, Gregory C. Wolniak, and Patrick T.
Terenzini. "First-Generation College Students: Additional Evidence On
College Experiences And Outcomes." The Journal of Higher Education 75.3 (2004): 249-284. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment